Patch notes · latest 2026-11-08

Patch notes

Every change to the library, logged like a game update: entries added, tiers moved up or down, and revisions. Tiers only move when the published evidence does.

  • added
  • tier up
  • tier down
  • revised
  • new study

peptidemeta goes live: a public library of peptides ranked by the strength of their published evidence, with every tier backed by linked sources. No dosing, no sourcing, no hype.

Entries
56
Ranked
47
Combos
9
Cited studies
69

Tier spread · 47 ranked

  • Tier S: 8 17%
  • Tier A: 17 36%
  • Tier B: 7 15%
  • Tier C: 15 32%
  • Tier D: 0 0%
  • added: Every peptide in the library, each with an evidence tier, a written rationale, regulatory status and source links.
  • revised: Every cited study is checked against PubMed; citations whose record does not match are hidden until corrected.
  • added: Popular combos, listed with their components but deliberately left unranked: blends have no published studies of their own.
  • added: Tier list, codex and periodic-table views, plus side-by-side matchups for comparing entries.
  • added: Sequence fingerprints for every entry with a defined amino-acid sequence.
  • added: Wiki primers on peptides, reading a study and regulation, plus a glossary of common terms.
  • added: Lore: a sourced timeline of peptide science, from the first hormone to modern incretin drugs.
  • revised: Published the evidence-tier methodology, including what tiers do not mean.
  • new study: Research Pulse: an automatic feed of recent PubMed papers that mention library entries.
esc
↑↓ navigate ↵ open